Thursday, February 9, 2017

More Left-Handed Phoniness


Will the United Nations wield its unproven claim that greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions cause climate change to require each of its 193 member nations to measure and report GHG emissions -- a prerequisite for a global carbon tax?

Todd Stern, head of the American delegation at the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change meeting in Lima, Peru, says the U.S. is “perfectly happy to have an assessment process” for “clear and understandable” Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), “so that everybody knows what others are doing” — adding that all American actions are to “transform our economy.” UN Secretary-General Ban-ki Moon, another UN stooge, says FACMeasuring and reporting GHG emissions would indeed “transform our economy” by providing the UN with criteria needed to create a carbon taxing scheme to amass trillions of dollars to redistribute wealth around the globe.

The UN wants a carbon tax to implement sustainable development, which is environmental, social and economic equity, sometimes called justice. Social justice, climate/environmental justice, and economic justice are alluring terms that promise absolute equity to the masses. Politically speaking, it is green on the outside and red on the inside like a watermelon. And it would kill the geese that lay the golden eggs by deconstructing national economies by phasing out the use of all fossil fuels by 2050.


The UN’s non-governmental organizations refuse to acknowledge that the Earth has not warmed since 1998 as they relentlessly rabble-rouse for global governance/global government. The NGOs expect the INDCs to do more than mitigate GHG emissions; they are calling for “adequate and fair contributions with a science-based equity review.”

The key word is “equity” as they complain that nations have only given about $10 billion to the Green Climate Fund established by the UNFCCC in 2009 to redistribute $100 billion annually by 2020 from rich to poor nations and increase to $500 billion annually by 2050. They want more of our money and they want to take it via a global carbon tax which would be placed on anything that moves, breathes, or creates income.

The NGOs also refuse to acknowledge that renewable energy sources like wind and solar would be equivalent to rubbing two sticks together to start a fire since they are wholly inadequate replacements for fossil fuels that create abundant, clean energy so that ALL people can attain a healthy standard of living.

3 comments:

  1. Oh my gosh, am I tired of all this left-right back and forth, but the thing is, I'm not going to sit still and let some rich elitist f*cker dream up another way to screw me over. Taxes suck but a global tax carbon tax is beyond what I will consider. If you want to stir up people, take away what they earn. It's ALL bogus!!! A bunch of lies to convince us to let them give us a close haircut. I don't want a haircut!!!

    Have a nice day.

    ReplyDelete
  2. this blog is totally stupid

    ReplyDelete
  3. #1 - indeed, bogus, something for nothing and no meat to go with those potatoes, if ya know what I mean

    #2 - Well, sure...

    ReplyDelete